We've heard from several of you recently regarding a U.S. Forest Service proposal on photography permits for wilderness areas. You were justifiably concerned that the proposed rule change could affect amateur photographers and the general public. Some reports claimed there could be a fee of as much as $1,500 for photographing in wilderness areas.
Now, the Forest Service has clarified its stance on the issue. The proposed change would only make permanent a temporary directive that's been in place for years. And it only applies to commercial shoots, such as movies or TV commercials; it would not affect the vast majority of photographers or other visitors to wilderness areas.
Here's an excerpt of a Reuters report from late last week:
U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell said late on Thursday he wanted to clear up that the provisions in the draft directive do not apply to media reporters or vacationers.
"If you're there to gather news or take recreational photographs, no permit would be required. We take your First Amendment rights very seriously," Tidwell said in a statement.
"We're looking forward to talking with journalists and concerned citizens to help allay some of the concerns we've been hearing and clarify what's covered by this proposed directive."
Tidwell added that professional and amateur photographers do not need a permit to photograph in wilderness areas unless they use models, actors or props; work in areas that are normally off-limits to the public; or incur additional administrative costs.
Some people remain concerned that the proposal is too vague. If you're in that group, the Forest Service is soliciting public comment on the proposal. You can weigh in by clicking here.
(Photo: Bob Miller | Organ Pipe Cactus Wilderness)